The bailout proposal before Congress seems to have been rejected because legislators were worried that voters back home saw it as a bailout of Wall Street at the expense of Main Street. Is such a fear rational? It may be that voters simply don’t understand or believe that a broader Wall Street failure could quickly trickle down and harm their Main Street interests. Or could it be that they’re willing to pay a price to exhibit their disgust even it if ultimately harms their self interest?
Stephen Dubner compares the consideration of the “bailout proposal” to the economic exercise called the the Ultimatum game.

Notes

Show

Blog comments powered by Disqus